These are from my 80's inspired shoot. I found it so hard to whittle the 350-odd photos I took down to 4, just because I loved them all so much. I think it was a combination of having a really great model, loving the makeup and the lighting working well. I managed to end up with these 4 and I am honestly so happy with them, even before editing I loved them so much. The only thing that did annoy me was that the larger one on the left is a slightly different colour to the others which is a bit of an inconvenience. I'm not even sure why this happened as they were all taken on the same setting, and they were all edited in the same way. The only thing I can think of is that the shutter speed was off and the flash was caught at a different time with that one. By having that one as the larger one and setting the other three out as a triple I got around this and I think the three really work well together anyway. As for the specific sizings, I'm going to have the big one as an A1 and the triples as A2, ordered as shown above with potentially more of a separation between the single and the triple.
One of the reasons I think these came out so well is that he doesn't look like a stereotypical over-the-top drag queen; the makeup doesn't look out of place on his face. This really helps capture the slight overstep of the gender boundary in a way that isn't clownish to the extent that people can make fun of it, but still blurs masculinity/femininity to the point where it's noticeable in a 'normal' way.
It's a shame that the female model I originally planned for this shoot was unable to do it in the end, she was a lot more androgynous than this model so the gender-bending would've worked a lot better. I also wish I'd have had some more money to buy a dress for Jimmy to wear - again this would've added to what I was going for. Overall I'm pleased with the way they came out and I think they do convey the message, even if it's not as historically accurate as I would've liked.
My 60s shoot is a lot softer and just feels more lighthearted than the rest of the shoots. I am slightly annoyed that the different tones for the background, but because the portrait shots and landscape shots both have similar tones respectively, I don't think it matters a huge amount. I didn't do much in the way of editing, just changed the levels to give them a bit of life and changed the tone slightly. I've decided to display all of these photos as A3. I would've perhaps liked the top right picture a little bigger, but they were taken with a higher ISO so they are quite grainy compared to the other shoots (in my defence it was my first studio shoot in a while, I was rushing and I'm not a camera wizard quite yet). Also, I didn't want the top left photo to be displayed alone but I don't think it would've worked well with the other two on it's own.
Of all the shoots I did, I feel this one least represents the shift in gender boundaries. I mean, sure, she has short hair, but that was pretty fashionable at the time, even for women that adhered to the set gender stereotypes. This does, however, highlight the shift in what was considered femininely attractive in mainstream culture; half a century previous women were still wearing skirts and corsets and the fact that such a 'masculine' hairstyle became such an iconic style for the time.
Edit- I removed one photo from the final layout because it wasn't as strong as the others and the space looked better with 3 photos. |
The punk shoot was the only one I did outside and without being able to control the lighting as much, I felt like these needed a bit more editing. When I first shot these, I loved them. The model was great- really relaxed and not awkward on camera at all. It was the first shoot I did so liking them gave me a little sense of relief. After editing all the rest of my photos from the studio shoots that had all used lighting purposely and thoughtfully, I really had a hard time editing these. Originally I wasn't going to do these black and white but because they all had different backgrounds - from being shot on location as opposed to a set backdrop - I didn't feel like any of them really fit together in colour. Putting them into black and white was my way of tying them together a bit more, which I think worked as a lot of the punk images I came across in my research were in black and white anyway. They all look a bit more harsh than the 1920s black and white (where a softbox was used) but in my opinion this adds to the punk theme. The larger image will be displayed as A2 and the other 3 as A3.
What really throws this across the gender boundary is the buzzcut. Punks were known for pretty much saying F you to every social stereotype there was, so it was pretty easy to use this style for the project.